Author: Milner, M W;Edwards, S;Turnbull, D B;Enjily, V
Standard: £9 + VAT
An IStructE account gives you access to a world of knowledge. Create a profile to receive details of our unique range of resources, events and training.
Added to basket
Milner, M W;Edwards, S;Turnbull, D B;Enjily, V
Greater use of factory prefabricated components is increasingly being recognised by the construction industry as a means of improving productivity and fulfilling customer requirements. The significance of this approach to construction is recognised in Sir John Egan’s recent report ‘Rethinking Construction’ for DETR. Adoption of prefabricated products delivers benefits via overall project cost reduction, faster construction times, reduced material waste and fewer call-backs. The application of this trend to floor construction is evident in timber prefabricated floor assemblies and kit-based systems. This feature reconsiders timber as a component in floor systems, and illustrates the potential for improvement, drawing upon prefabrication and variation of construction forms away from the traditional. The principles of reengineering the business process have been used, focusing on industry competitiveness, cost-efficient supply-chain management, and satisfaction of customer needs. This feature is the result of work supported by the Department of the Environment, Transport & the Regions (DETR), TRADA, Guildway Timber Structures, and TRADA Technology. M.W. Milner and R.J. Bainbridge
This paper presents an overview of the scope for the use of timber in bridges. The wide variety and global availability of timber as a construction resource is illustrated, together with case studies of a selection of bridges employing timber as the primary structural material. C.J. Mettem, R.J. Bainbridge and D.L. Jayanetti
Lateral-torsional buckling of beams Richard Harris, from Bournemouth, has examined the eflective length of compression flanges of - as he describes it - ‘(not so) simple beams’ and continues: This subject causes much confusion. If we, as a profession, cannot even agree on the design of simple beams, we do not deserve the respect from the public that so many of us apparently want. Unfortunately, the guidance on effective length in the various British Standards relating to structural steelwork elicits no uniform response from practitioners. I do not think thathis should be blamed on ‘engineering judgment’. There are two aspects, each of which is often treated differently by various designers: (i) does the compression flange have sufficient restraint to prevent lateral-torsional buckling? (ii) if not, what is the effective length of the flange? SCI publication Lateral Stability of Steel Beams and Columns, gives excellent guidance.