The Institution of Structural Engineers The Institution of Structural Engineers
Back to Previous

Top 5 questions from structural engineers about structural thermal breaks (Sponsored content)

Tag
Author
Date published
Price

This blog from Farrat addresses the most common questions asked by Structural Engineers when specifying Farrat Structural Thermal Breaks.

The ability to transmit structural loads whilst addressing thermal performance through a building envelope has long been a difficult balance for building designers. The weight of the decision has often fallen on the side of the structure, with the importance of structural integrity winning out against the impact of structural members piercing the thermal envelope.
 
However, as the energy demands of new and retrofit buildings have grown, so have the requirements to minimise that energy usage and the potential of issues such as thermal bridging.
 
This has resulted in greater levels of insulation in planar elements of a building envelope, leading to more noticeable and detrimental effects of those ‘hard to treat’ details such as structural penetrations.
 
In addition, the growing influence of fire design on structures has led to the requirement for enhanced performance criteria of building materials that are incorporated into the building envelope. To address this imbalance, new building materials and methods of thermally breaking structural connections, such as Structural Thermal Breaks, have developed. 
 
In the below guide, we address the most common questions asked by Structural Engineers when specifying Farrat Structural Thermal Breaks.
 
Farrat are specialists in thermal, acoustic and structural isolation within the Construction industry. With over 60 years’ experience in the design and manufacture of building construction solutions, Farrat’s niche knowledge of materials science and building physics has been at the heart of the development of Structural Thermal Breaks that can deliver consistent and safe structural performance, whilst minimising the impact of thermal bridges.


 

  1. Which Farrat Structural Thermal Break Material should I specify?
 
Farrat Structural Thermal Breaks take the form of flat plates of custom dimensions, which provide Structural Engineers with the freedom to design building connections requiring thermal isolation to standard codes, with simple configuration.
 
Farrat offer three independently tested Structural Thermal Break materials, which are designed to balance high structural performance and low thermal conductivity.
 
  1. Farrat TBK is most specified across typical connection details, with high compressive strength (312MPa fck) and the best thermal performance in the range (0.187 W/mK).
     
  2. Farrat TBF is the optimum material when fire performance is a consideration, such as within high-rise buildings, due to its high compressive strength (355MPa fck) and low thermal conductivity (0.2 W/mK) performance characteristics, supported by an A2, s1,d0 Non-Combustible Classification.
     
  3. Farrat TBL is the favourable material when structural loadings and requirements for thermal performance are lower, and budgets are constrained, offering medium compressive strength (89MPa fck) and thermal conductivity (0.292 W/mK) performance characteristics.


 
Farrat advise that design professionals always validate that thermal break materials are independently tested and certified with an appropriate safety factor that has been applied to characteristic performance values, to determine the design load (fcd).
 
Full material characteristics and performance specifications for each material are available on the Structural Engineers Portal here.
 
 
 
  1. How do I design connections incorporating Farrat Structural Thermal Breaks?
 
A breakdown of what to consider when designing structural steel connections is contained within the Farrat Structural Thermal Break Technical Guide and supporting SCI, Steel Construction Institute assessment document.
 
As an overview:
  1.  Structural Thermal Break plates should be considered as a “pack” in terms of connection design.
  2. All Shear forces need to be accommodated by the connection bolts. As a result of the multiple layers in the connection the grip length of the bolts may be significantly increased, it may also be necessary to reduce the anticipated shear resistance of the bolts in the connection.
  3. Reference should be made to BS EN 1993-3 1-8: 2005 Eurocode 3. Design of steel structures.
 
 
  1. Can Farrat Structural Thermal Breaks support the loads I am designing for?
 
The exact physical and mechanical properties for Farrat Structural Thermal Breaks are contained in the Farrat Structural Thermal Break Technical Guide.
 
As a quick guide:
  1. Farrat TBF and Farrat TBK materials offer compressive strength comparable with Steel.
  2. Farrat TBL has a compressive strength greater than Concrete.
  3. Structural Thermal Break plates in a connection should only be designed to resist compressive forces.
  4. Consideration should also be taken of compressive creep. Farrat materials are formulated to resist long term creep, but this element should be factored into any design.
  5. Many materials which exhibit good thermal properties have poor long term creep profiles.
  6. Reference should be made to BS EN 1993-3 1-8: 2005 Eurocode 3. Design of steel structures.
 
 
  1. What is the friction coefficient for Farrat Structural Thermal Breaks?
 
The coefficient of friction of a thermal break plate is not a relevant property for the structural design of connections with non-pre-loaded bolts.
 
Whilst figures for frictional resistance of Farrat Structural Thermal Breaks can be obtained, it will differ depending on the material with which it is in contact and should be treated with caution when designing connections involving Preloaded or TCB bolts.




 
  1. Will Farrat Structural Thermal Break plates achieve a 120-minute fire rating?
 
Structural steel connections that require a 120-minute fire rating will typically need to be protected with either an intumescent coating system or a fire protection board. In all situations, the Structural Thermal Breaks should receive the same level of protection as the steel.
 
However, Farrat TBF Structural Thermal Breaks have been tested unprotected in fire conditions, in structural steel connections, to temperatures more than 1000°C for 120 minutes and maintained structural integrity.
 
 
In summary, when designing for Structural Thermal Breaks:
  1. Check that the chosen material is independently verified to resist the applied compression forces, with an appropriate safety factor applied to determine design loading.
  2. Check that any additional rotation due to compression of the thermal break plate is acceptable.
  3. Check the shear resistance of the bolts is acceptable given that there may be a reduction due to the use of packs and larger grip lengths.
     
If using Pre tensioned bolts:
  1. Check the slip resistance of the connection considering the coefficient of friction and the number of surfaces.
  2. Check the thermal break plate can resist the local compression forces around the bolts.
     
Where fire performance is concerned:
  1.  Consult with Farrat for the correct specification of fully tested and certified materials.

 
 
For more information on integrating Structural Thermal Break solutions into typical, or bespoke, structural steel connections, visit www.farrat.com/thermalbreaks or contact Chris Lister, Commercial Manager, to discuss any technical queries at [email protected], +44 (0) 161 924 1603.

Tags

Blog Other

Related Resources & Events

Conference
Group of people sat around board room table

SME business practice conference 2024

A hands-on conference, tailored to SME owners, equipping SME practitioners with a comprehensive toolkit to capitalise on emerging industry priorities and maximise business potential.

Date – 10 October 2024
Location – Institution of Structural Engineers international HQ
Price – £55 - £325 + VAT
Blog
Speaking to a broker is important for professional indemnity insurance

Professional risk and PI insurance: building resilience

Griffiths & Armour Partner, Tanya Winstanley, shares her thoughts on building resilience into SME businesses and provides an update on Griffiths & Armour’s ‘Constructing change’ initiative, which aims to stimulate debate on the wider issues facing the sector.

Date – 3 July 2024
Author – Tanya Winstanley
The Structural Engineer
Image of modular sections in a warehouse

Professional indemnity insurance considerations when adopting modern methods of construction

Claire Meade and Stephen Hargreaves of insurance broker Griffiths & Armour provide an update of insurers' attitudes to MMC and implications for designers' insurance policies.

Date – 1 February 2024
Author – Claire Meade and Stephen Hargreaves
Price – £10
Training
Engineer with notepad and pen inspecting and working at construction site

Building Safety Act: what the secondary legislation means for Structural Engineers

Hear experts from leading City law firm Bevan Brittan discuss the new obligations and liabilities for built-environment professionals under the Building Safety Act secondary legislation, which has come into force in England and Wales on 1 October 2023.

Date – 28 November 2023
Author – Various
Price – Free
The Structural Engineer
Speaking to a broker is important for professional indemnity insurance

Specifying reused structural steel: some professional indemnity insurance considerations

Claire Meade of insurance broker Griffiths & Armour examines the insurance industry approach to the emerging trend for reuse of structural steel, and considers the disclosure requirements for designers.

Date – 1 June 2023
Author – Claire Meade
Price – £10
The Structural Engineer
Roundtable discussion including Eleana Savvidi, Claire Meade and Emma Snelson

Roundtable: Talking mass timber: why early engagement is key to allaying insurers' concerns

Robin Jones summarises the discussions and key recommendations from a roundtable examining the insurance risks relating to mass timber construction.

Date – 2 May 2023
Author – Robin Jones
Price – £0