Back to Previous

Top 5 questions from structural engineers about structural thermal breaks (Sponsored content)

This blog from Farrat addresses the most common questions asked by Structural Engineers when specifying Farrat Structural Thermal Breaks.

The ability to transmit structural loads whilst addressing thermal performance through a building envelope has long been a difficult balance for building designers. The weight of the decision has often fallen on the side of the structure, with the importance of structural integrity winning out against the impact of structural members piercing the thermal envelope.
However, as the energy demands of new and retrofit buildings have grown, so have the requirements to minimise that energy usage and the potential of issues such as thermal bridging.
This has resulted in greater levels of insulation in planar elements of a building envelope, leading to more noticeable and detrimental effects of those ‘hard to treat’ details such as structural penetrations.
In addition, the growing influence of fire design on structures has led to the requirement for enhanced performance criteria of building materials that are incorporated into the building envelope. To address this imbalance, new building materials and methods of thermally breaking structural connections, such as Structural Thermal Breaks, have developed. 
In the below guide, we address the most common questions asked by Structural Engineers when specifying Farrat Structural Thermal Breaks.
Farrat are specialists in thermal, acoustic and structural isolation within the Construction industry. With over 60 years’ experience in the design and manufacture of building construction solutions, Farrat’s niche knowledge of materials science and building physics has been at the heart of the development of Structural Thermal Breaks that can deliver consistent and safe structural performance, whilst minimising the impact of thermal bridges.


  1. Which Farrat Structural Thermal Break Material should I specify?
Farrat Structural Thermal Breaks take the form of flat plates of custom dimensions, which provide Structural Engineers with the freedom to design building connections requiring thermal isolation to standard codes, with simple configuration.
Farrat offer three independently tested Structural Thermal Break materials, which are designed to balance high structural performance and low thermal conductivity.
  1. Farrat TBK is most specified across typical connection details, with high compressive strength (312MPa fck) and the best thermal performance in the range (0.187 W/mK).
  2. Farrat TBF is the optimum material when fire performance is a consideration, such as within high-rise buildings, due to its high compressive strength (355MPa fck) and low thermal conductivity (0.2 W/mK) performance characteristics, supported by an A2, s1,d0 Non-Combustible Classification.
  3. Farrat TBL is the favourable material when structural loadings and requirements for thermal performance are lower, and budgets are constrained, offering medium compressive strength (89MPa fck) and thermal conductivity (0.292 W/mK) performance characteristics.

Farrat advise that design professionals always validate that thermal break materials are independently tested and certified with an appropriate safety factor that has been applied to characteristic performance values, to determine the design load (fcd).
Full material characteristics and performance specifications for each material are available on the Structural Engineers Portal here.
  1. How do I design connections incorporating Farrat Structural Thermal Breaks?
A breakdown of what to consider when designing structural steel connections is contained within the Farrat Structural Thermal Break Technical Guide and supporting SCI, Steel Construction Institute assessment document.
As an overview:
  1.  Structural Thermal Break plates should be considered as a “pack” in terms of connection design.
  2. All Shear forces need to be accommodated by the connection bolts. As a result of the multiple layers in the connection the grip length of the bolts may be significantly increased, it may also be necessary to reduce the anticipated shear resistance of the bolts in the connection.
  3. Reference should be made to BS EN 1993-3 1-8: 2005 Eurocode 3. Design of steel structures.
  1. Can Farrat Structural Thermal Breaks support the loads I am designing for?
The exact physical and mechanical properties for Farrat Structural Thermal Breaks are contained in the Farrat Structural Thermal Break Technical Guide.
As a quick guide:
  1. Farrat TBF and Farrat TBK materials offer compressive strength comparable with Steel.
  2. Farrat TBL has a compressive strength greater than Concrete.
  3. Structural Thermal Break plates in a connection should only be designed to resist compressive forces.
  4. Consideration should also be taken of compressive creep. Farrat materials are formulated to resist long term creep, but this element should be factored into any design.
  5. Many materials which exhibit good thermal properties have poor long term creep profiles.
  6. Reference should be made to BS EN 1993-3 1-8: 2005 Eurocode 3. Design of steel structures.
  1. What is the friction coefficient for Farrat Structural Thermal Breaks?
The coefficient of friction of a thermal break plate is not a relevant property for the structural design of connections with non-pre-loaded bolts.
Whilst figures for frictional resistance of Farrat Structural Thermal Breaks can be obtained, it will differ depending on the material with which it is in contact and should be treated with caution when designing connections involving Preloaded or TCB bolts.

  1. Will Farrat Structural Thermal Break plates achieve a 120-minute fire rating?
Structural steel connections that require a 120-minute fire rating will typically need to be protected with either an intumescent coating system or a fire protection board. In all situations, the Structural Thermal Breaks should receive the same level of protection as the steel.
However, Farrat TBF Structural Thermal Breaks have been tested unprotected in fire conditions, in structural steel connections, to temperatures more than 1000°C for 120 minutes and maintained structural integrity.
In summary, when designing for Structural Thermal Breaks:
  1. Check that the chosen material is independently verified to resist the applied compression forces, with an appropriate safety factor applied to determine design loading.
  2. Check that any additional rotation due to compression of the thermal break plate is acceptable.
  3. Check the shear resistance of the bolts is acceptable given that there may be a reduction due to the use of packs and larger grip lengths.
If using Pre tensioned bolts:
  1. Check the slip resistance of the connection considering the coefficient of friction and the number of surfaces.
  2. Check the thermal break plate can resist the local compression forces around the bolts.
Where fire performance is concerned:
  1.  Consult with Farrat for the correct specification of fully tested and certified materials.

For more information on integrating Structural Thermal Break solutions into typical, or bespoke, structural steel connections, visit or contact Chris Lister, Commercial Manager, to discuss any technical queries at [email protected], +44 (0) 161 924 1603.


Blog Other

Related Resources & Events

two people shaking hands

Client appointments and terms of engagement: a legal toolkit

This one day, face-to-face course enables engineers to understand, evaluate and negotiate confidently the commercial or legal terms of proposed contracts with clients.

Date ‐ 14 September 2022
Location ‐ The Institution of Structural Engineers
Price ‐ £305 - £465 + VAT
Blue abstract blocks

SME business practice conference 2021

Date ‐ 13 April 2022
Author ‐ Various
Price ‐ Free
The Structural Engineer
Personal dialling telephone

Back to basics in troubled times – your notification obligations to your insurer

This CPD module, sponsored by Griffiths & Armour, offers guidance to engineers on when they should notify their professional indemnity insurers about potential claims on their policy.

Date ‐ 1 February 2022
Author ‐ Griffiths & Armour
Price ‐ £0
Blue abstract blocks

Professional indemnity insurance: Hope for the best but don’t forget to plan for the worst

This blog from Griffiths & Armour briefly details the pitfalls related to PI insurance and how they can be resolved.

Date ‐ 18 August 2021
Author ‐ Graeme Tinney, Griffiths & Armour
Price ‐ Free
The Structural Engineer
<h4>Business Practice Note No. 35: Dealing with unauthorised changes on site</h4>

Business Practice Note No. 35: Dealing with unauthorised changes on site

In this note, Simon Pitchers provides advice to structural engineering professionals on how to proceed if they become aware that an unauthorised change to the design has taken place on site.

Date ‐ 16 October 2020
Author ‐ Simon Pitchers
Price ‐ £9
Blue abstract blocks

Fitness to Practise and the impact on your professional indemnity insurance

Emma Lynch discusses what your PI insurance obligations are and why they matter.

Date ‐ 6 January 2020
Author ‐ Emma Lynch
Price ‐ Free