Embodied carbon: structural sensitivity study

Author: Jonathan Roynon, BuroHappold

Date published

2 April 2020

Price
Free
Back to Previous

Embodied carbon: structural sensitivity study

Case Study
Date published

2 April 2020

Author

Jonathan Roynon, BuroHappold

Price

Free

Author

Jonathan Roynon, BuroHappold

Jonathan Roynon describes a BuroHappold study, shared on istructe.org as part of efforts to provoke discussion and knowledge-sharing on topics related to the climate emergency.

This study has been developed to help structural engineers in our practice understand the impact of their design decisions on the embodied carbon of the resulting building. ​This piece of work is shared in the hope that it will provoke discussion and is not intended to provide design solutions!

It is more interested in sensitivity to design decisions (materials, grids etc) than absolute accuracy in the final figures.

As a baseline scheme we took a generic 8000m2 six storey building with a 9m x 9m column grid designed for an imposed load of 4+1kN/m2 and developed concrete, steel and timber solutions using the most conventional approach for each of these materials (concrete flat slab, composite steel beams with metal deck slabs and glulam beams with cross laminated timber slabs).

With these three baseline schemes we then studied the impact of changing each of the different design parameters in turn on the total embodied carbon.

These parameters included structural arrangement, loading, column grid, material specification, foundation type, structural system etc.

Finally, for each baseline scheme a series of parameters were changed together in steps to look at the potential total variation in embodied carbon that could be achieved within each system.

These included some option to get to very low embodied carbon values but these start to require compromises in structural depth, construction programme, column spacing and loading.

The overarching conclusion would appear to be that material choice has rather less impact on embodied carbon than concrete specification, grid choice and loadings.

This encourages us to focus harder on ensuring lean design and sensible grids whatever the material used.
 

Additional information

Format:
PDF
Pages:
7

Tags

Case Study Climate change Beam Column Conceptual Design Carbon

Related Resources & Events

The Structural Engineer
<h4>Rationalisation versus optimisation – getting the balance right in changing times</h4>

Rationalisation versus optimisation – getting the balance right in changing times

Ian Poole explores ways to improve the utilisation ratio of designs, and encourages engineers to challenge assumptions that favour rationalisation over optimisation.

Date - 16 October 2020
Author - Ian Poole
Price - £0
The Structural Engineer
<h4>Setting carbon targets: an introduction to the proposed SCORS rating scheme</h4>

Setting carbon targets: an introduction to the proposed SCORS rating scheme

Will Arnold, Mike Cook, Duncan Cox, Orlando Gibbons and John Orr present SCORS – a proposed carbon rating scheme for structures – and encourage engineers to adopt carbon targets for their projects.

Date - 16 October 2020
Author - Will Arnold, Mike Cook, Duncan Cox, Orlando Gibbons and John Orr
Price - £0
The Structural Engineer
<h4>What do we mean by efficiency? A holistic approach to reducing embodied carbon</h4>

What do we mean by efficiency? A holistic approach to reducing embodied carbon

Ben Gholam describes the development by Price & Myers of a parametric benchmarking tool to allow engineers to produce scheme designs with the lowest embodied carbon.

Date - 16 October 2020
Author - Ben Gholam
Price - £0