Embodied carbon: structural sensitivity study

Author: Jonathan Roynon, BuroHappold

Date published

2 April 2020

Price
Free
Back to Previous

Embodied carbon: structural sensitivity study

Case Study
Date published

2 April 2020

Author

Jonathan Roynon, BuroHappold

Price

Free

Author

Jonathan Roynon, BuroHappold

Jonathan Roynon describes a BuroHappold study, shared on istructe.org as part of efforts to provoke discussion and knowledge-sharing on topics related to the climate emergency.

This study has been developed to help structural engineers in our practice understand the impact of their design decisions on the embodied carbon of the resulting building. ​This piece of work is shared in the hope that it will provoke discussion and is not intended to provide design solutions!

It is more interested in sensitivity to design decisions (materials, grids etc) than absolute accuracy in the final figures.

As a baseline scheme we took a generic 8000m2 six storey building with a 9m x 9m column grid designed for an imposed load of 4+1kN/m2 and developed concrete, steel and timber solutions using the most conventional approach for each of these materials (concrete flat slab, composite steel beams with metal deck slabs and glulam beams with cross laminated timber slabs).

With these three baseline schemes we then studied the impact of changing each of the different design parameters in turn on the total embodied carbon.

These parameters included structural arrangement, loading, column grid, material specification, foundation type, structural system etc.

Finally, for each baseline scheme a series of parameters were changed together in steps to look at the potential total variation in embodied carbon that could be achieved within each system.

These included some option to get to very low embodied carbon values but these start to require compromises in structural depth, construction programme, column spacing and loading.

The overarching conclusion would appear to be that material choice has rather less impact on embodied carbon than concrete specification, grid choice and loadings.

This encourages us to focus harder on ensuring lean design and sensible grids whatever the material used.
 

Additional information

Format:
PDF
Pages:
7

Tags

Case Study Climate change Beam Column Conceptual Design Carbon

Related Resources & Events

Guidance
Blue abstract blocks

How to specify lower carbon concrete

Jenny Burridge of the Concrete Centre discusses a more sustainable approach to concrete.

Date - 6 August 2020
Author - Jenny Burridge
The Structural Engineer
Blue abstract blocks

Profile: Mike Cook

Engineers must resist pressure to build environmentally unsustainable schemes if we want to be judged well by future generations, says 2020 Gold Medal winner and former Institution Vice-President, Mike Cook.

Date - 1 August 2020
Author - Jackie Whitelaw
Price - £0
The Structural Engineer
Timber roof structure of Macallan Distillery

Time for a structural change?

To design more sustainable buildings, big decisions need to be made early in the design process. Could laying out the structure to a 300mm planning grid reduce embodied carbon, enable the circular economy and still retain the uniqueness of design, asks David Treacy.

Date - 1 August 2020
Author - David Treacy
Price - £0