Embodied carbon: structural sensitivity study

Author: Jonathan Roynon, BuroHappold

Date published

2 April 2020

Price
Free
Back to Previous

Embodied carbon: structural sensitivity study

Case Study
Date published

2 April 2020

Author

Jonathan Roynon, BuroHappold

Price

Free

Author

Jonathan Roynon, BuroHappold

Jonathan Roynon describes a BuroHappold study, shared on istructe.org as part of efforts to provoke discussion and knowledge-sharing on topics related to the climate emergency.

This study has been developed to help structural engineers in our practice understand the impact of their design decisions on the embodied carbon of the resulting building. ​This piece of work is shared in the hope that it will provoke discussion and is not intended to provide design solutions!

It is more interested in sensitivity to design decisions (materials, grids etc) than absolute accuracy in the final figures.

As a baseline scheme we took a generic 8000m2 six storey building with a 9m x 9m column grid designed for an imposed load of 4+1kN/m2 and developed concrete, steel and timber solutions using the most conventional approach for each of these materials (concrete flat slab, composite steel beams with metal deck slabs and glulam beams with cross laminated timber slabs).

With these three baseline schemes we then studied the impact of changing each of the different design parameters in turn on the total embodied carbon.

These parameters included structural arrangement, loading, column grid, material specification, foundation type, structural system etc.

Finally, for each baseline scheme a series of parameters were changed together in steps to look at the potential total variation in embodied carbon that could be achieved within each system.

These included some option to get to very low embodied carbon values but these start to require compromises in structural depth, construction programme, column spacing and loading.

The overarching conclusion would appear to be that material choice has rather less impact on embodied carbon than concrete specification, grid choice and loadings.

This encourages us to focus harder on ensuring lean design and sensible grids whatever the material used.
 

Additional information

Format:
PDF
Pages:
7

Tags

Case Study Climate change Beam Column Conceptual Design Carbon

Related Resources & Events

The Structural Engineer
<h4>Structural engineering innovation for a zero-carbon world: an R&D agenda to match the carbon budget</h4>

Structural engineering innovation for a zero-carbon world: an R&D agenda to match the carbon budget

Pete Winslow, Mike Sefton and Will Arnold set out a vision for a net-zero structural engineering sector and the R&D that we as a profession need to tackle to get there.

Date ‐ 31 March 2021
Author ‐ Pete Winslow, Mike Sefton and Will Arnold
Price ‐ £0
The Structural Engineer
<h4>IABSE Henderson Colloquium 2020: Steps to achieve a net-zero construction industry</h4>

IABSE Henderson Colloquium 2020: Steps to achieve a net-zero construction industry

Mike Cook summarises the outcomes of the IABSE British Group’s annual debating forum, setting out key actions that stakeholders in the construction industry can take to enable a transition to net zero.

Date ‐ 31 March 2021
Author ‐ Mike Cook
Price ‐ £0
The Structural Engineer
<h4>Developing a low-carbon, circular economy for steel</h4>

Developing a low-carbon, circular economy for steel

Walter Swann explains how structural engineers can support a transition to a low-carbon steel industry through their design and specifying decisions.

Date ‐ 31 March 2021
Author ‐ Walter Swann
Price ‐ £0