Embodied carbon: structural sensitivity study

Author: Jonathan Roynon, BuroHappold

Date published

2 April 2020

Price
Free
Back to Previous

Embodied carbon: structural sensitivity study

Case Study
Author

Jonathan Roynon, BuroHappold

Date published

2 April 2020

Author

Jonathan Roynon, BuroHappold

Price

Free

Jonathan Roynon describes a BuroHappold study, shared on istructe.org as part of efforts to provoke discussion and knowledge-sharing on topics related to the climate emergency.

This study has been developed to help structural engineers in our practice understand the impact of their design decisions on the embodied carbon of the resulting building. ​This piece of work is shared in the hope that it will provoke discussion and is not intended to provide design solutions!

It is more interested in sensitivity to design decisions (materials, grids etc) than absolute accuracy in the final figures.

As a baseline scheme we took a generic 8000m2 six storey building with a 9m x 9m column grid designed for an imposed load of 4+1kN/m2 and developed concrete, steel and timber solutions using the most conventional approach for each of these materials (concrete flat slab, composite steel beams with metal deck slabs and glulam beams with cross laminated timber slabs).

With these three baseline schemes we then studied the impact of changing each of the different design parameters in turn on the total embodied carbon.

These parameters included structural arrangement, loading, column grid, material specification, foundation type, structural system etc.

Finally, for each baseline scheme a series of parameters were changed together in steps to look at the potential total variation in embodied carbon that could be achieved within each system.

These included some option to get to very low embodied carbon values but these start to require compromises in structural depth, construction programme, column spacing and loading.

The overarching conclusion would appear to be that material choice has rather less impact on embodied carbon than concrete specification, grid choice and loadings.

This encourages us to focus harder on ensuring lean design and sensible grids whatever the material used.
 

Additional information

Format:
PDF
Pages:
7

Tags

Case Study Climate change Beam Column Conceptual Design Carbon

Related Resources & Events

Guidance
<h4>Circular economy and reuse: guidance for designers</h4>

Circular economy and reuse: guidance for designers

This new guidance is an essential read for any built environment professional developing new (or reusing existing) structures today. Across four principal sections it explains why the adoption of circular economy principles is critical.

Date ‐ 1 December 2022
Author ‐ P Gowler et al
Price ‐ £32.50
The Structural Engineer
<h4>Barriers to low-carbon design: what are they and how can we overcome them?</h4>

Barriers to low-carbon design: what are they and how can we overcome them?

Claire Thomas explores how her practice has fared regarding low-carbon design solutions, and asks what the construction industry can do to encourage low-carbon outcomes.

Date ‐ 8 September 2022
Author ‐ Claire Thomas
Price ‐ £9
The Structural Engineer
Plan of anticipated demolition

Delivering steel's circular economy potential

Steel reuse is now a viable low-carbon option for all parties to a project, as this article explains from the perspectives of contractor, steel producer, fabricator, engineer and client.

Date ‐ 8 September 2022
Author ‐ Various
Price ‐ £9