Embodied carbon: structural sensitivity study

Author: Jonathan Roynon, BuroHappold

Date published

2 April 2020

Price
Free
The Institution of Structural Engineers The Institution of Structural Engineers
Back to Previous

Embodied carbon: structural sensitivity study

Tag
Author
Date published
Price
Case Study
Author

Jonathan Roynon, BuroHappold

Date published

2 April 2020

Author

Jonathan Roynon, BuroHappold

Price

Free

Jonathan Roynon describes a BuroHappold study, shared on istructe.org as part of efforts to provoke discussion and knowledge-sharing on topics related to the climate emergency.

This study has been developed to help structural engineers in our practice understand the impact of their design decisions on the embodied carbon of the resulting building. ​This piece of work is shared in the hope that it will provoke discussion and is not intended to provide design solutions!

It is more interested in sensitivity to design decisions (materials, grids etc) than absolute accuracy in the final figures.

As a baseline scheme we took a generic 8000m2 six storey building with a 9m x 9m column grid designed for an imposed load of 4+1kN/m2 and developed concrete, steel and timber solutions using the most conventional approach for each of these materials (concrete flat slab, composite steel beams with metal deck slabs and glulam beams with cross laminated timber slabs).

With these three baseline schemes we then studied the impact of changing each of the different design parameters in turn on the total embodied carbon.

These parameters included structural arrangement, loading, column grid, material specification, foundation type, structural system etc.

Finally, for each baseline scheme a series of parameters were changed together in steps to look at the potential total variation in embodied carbon that could be achieved within each system.

These included some option to get to very low embodied carbon values but these start to require compromises in structural depth, construction programme, column spacing and loading.

The overarching conclusion would appear to be that material choice has rather less impact on embodied carbon than concrete specification, grid choice and loadings.

This encourages us to focus harder on ensuring lean design and sensible grids whatever the material used.
 

Additional information

Format:
PDF
Pages:
7

Tags

Case Study Climate change Beam Column Conceptual Design Carbon

Related Resources & Events

Guidance
<h4>Appraising factors of safety in existing engineered structures</h4>

Appraising factors of safety in existing engineered structures

Pre-order now for a 10% discount on the post-publication price*.

Date – 7 July 2025
Author – A Smith and D Kalorkoti (Arup)
Price – £17.95
The Structural Engineer
<h4>Reducing construction carbon: a planning, procurement and leadership method</h4>

Reducing construction carbon: a planning, procurement and leadership method

Alistair Kean, Andrew Kidd and Lucy Hayes describe how the Lower Thames Crossing project implemented a groundbreaking approach to carbon reduction by making this goal a central part of the procurement and contract management process.

Date – 1 May 2025
Author – Alistair Kean, Andrew Kidd and Lucy Hayes
Price – £0
The Structural Engineer
<h4>Putting the net-zero hierarchy into practice: Minimise waste</h4>

Putting the net-zero hierarchy into practice: Minimise waste

Emily Halliwell concludes this series of notes signposting key resources at each level in the IStructE hierarchy of net-zero design by looking at how to 'minimise waste'.

Date – 1 May 2025
Author – Emily Halliwell
Price – £0