Correspondence. High Grade Steel in Concrete
Date published

N/A

First published: N/A

Price

Standard: £9 + VAT
Members/Subscribers: Free

Buy Now

Added to basket

Back to Previous

Correspondence. High Grade Steel in Concrete

The Structural Engineer
Correspondence. High Grade Steel in Concrete
Date published

N/A

First published

N/A

Price

Standard: £9 + VAT
Members/Subscribers: Free

Buy Now

Sir,-In Dr. von Emperger’s lecture, and the ensuing discussion, considerable attention was paid to the significance of tension cracks in beams. I venture to suggest that they give no information regarding the actual strength of the beam. In the initial stages of loading, before the concrete is cracked, the tension is shared by the steel and concrete according to their modular ratio, and the principal stresses approximate to those in a homogeneous rectangular beam. As loading progresses, the concrete creeps in compression, and, as Dr. Faber showed, a parabolic or trapezoidal distribution of compressive stress results. This causes a lowering of the neutral axis, which is demonstrated by Dr. Probst’s experiment on the alternating loading of a non-reinforced beam, and raises the intensity of tensile stress in the concrete. In time the concrete will fail, and the failure will tend to follow the line of principal tensile stress, resulting in “diagonal tension” cracks. If the beam is not reinforced in shear, it is then in the condition of a Vierendeel truss, with each finger of concrete between adjacent cracks transmitting its increment of load through compression and bending. In time, the finger will fail in bending at one of its fixed ends, either at the steel or near the neutral axis. If shear reinforcement is present, the beam is in the condition of a lattice truss, and loading may be continued till it fails in tension or compression. Further opening of the cracks is due to elastic extension of the tension or shear reinforcement, and will disappear when the loading is removed. Thus the strength of the beam is entirely unaffected by tension cracks if proper shear reinforcement is provided.

Additional information

Format:
PDF
Publisher:
The Institution of Structural Engineers

Tags

Opinion Issue 2

Related Resources & Events

The Structural Engineer
Rigid Frame Bridges in Reinforced Concrete. Discussion on Mr. A.P. Mason's Paper

Rigid Frame Bridges in Reinforced Concrete. Discussion on Mr. A.P. Mason's Paper

Mr. M. N. RIDLEY, M.Inst.C.E. (Member of Council), proposing a vote of thanks to the author, welcomed the paper, particularly because it indicated the extent to which continuity in reinforced concrete work was being adopted. He had noticed that engineers were inclined to make pin joints in their bridges. They would put a pin joint in the centre of the arch and pin joints in the abutments, and he believed that in one or two cases there were as many as five. He had always maintained, however, that. a bridge of ordinary span was far safer and better, and sometimes more economically designed, if all pin joints were excluded. It was true that calculation was then more difficult, but he held that when that had been done one had the best type of work. Where there were very big spans, of course, one must consider pin joints or the equivalent, especially for expansion and contraction; but for shorter spans, at any rate up to 100 ft. and sometimes more, in reinforced concrete and steel work pin joints were quite unnecessary.

Price - £9
The Structural Engineer
Bridge Foundations-Part II. A Survey of the Attendant Problems in Design (Continued)

Bridge Foundations-Part II. A Survey of the Attendant Problems in Design (Continued)

On some bridge sites it may be advisable to adopt two or even more different types of piles. Conditions may demand the adoption of a combination of two forms of piling to obtain the best results. H.E. Brooke-Bradley

Price - £9
The Structural Engineer
The Constructional Aspect of Large Electricity Generating Stations

The Constructional Aspect of Large Electricity Generating Stations

The constructional side of large electricity generating stations is a subject which has perhaps not received the consideration it deserves. This appears somewhat surprising when it is realised that the cost of the building works only of a large modern power station, excluding coal and ash handling facilities, condensing water system, and external subsidiaries, may be a proportion of the order of some 20 per cent. to 25 per cent. of the total cost of the station completely equipped with plant. Arthur Creswell Dean

Author - Dean, Arthur Creswell
Price - £9