Technical Guidance Note (Level 2, No. 22): Workmanship and quality inspections by the structural eng

Author: Chris O'Regan

Date published

2 September 2019

First published: 2 September 2019

Price

Standard: £9 + VAT

Members/Subscribers: Free

Buy Now

Added to basket

Back to Previous

Technical Guidance Note (Level 2, No. 22): Workmanship and quality inspections by the structural engineer during construction


The Structural Engineer
Technical Guidance Note (Level 2, No. 22): Workmanship and quality inspections by the structural eng
Date published

2 September 2019

Author

Chris O'Regan

Price

Standard: £9 + VAT

Members/Subscribers: Free

First published

2 September 2019

Buy Now
Author

Chris O'Regan

Inspection of works on site during construction is a high-risk activity which requires skill and experience. Inspections are of the utmost importance as they help to reduce the risk of defects being present within the structure of the building – although they can never guarantee it. They should only be performed by those who are familiar with the design of the works and the limitations of construction methods.

The construction phase of a project is the stage where its design is implemented. Unforeseen variables have an impact on the assumptions made and changes may occur to the original design. Workmanship is also important, as the structural model used in design assumes good practice will be followed on site. For materials for which the partial factors used in design vary depending on the level of workmanship/supervision, it is essential to confirm that design assumptions have not been jeopardised.

It is typically the responsibility of the main contractor, supported by the specialist contractors’ designers, to ensure that the works are delivered in accordance with the design documentation.

The principal way workmanship is assured is through supervision and oversight by the main contractor. Any inspection carried out by the client’s design team, including by the structural engineer, will be in addition to the contractor’s monitoring of progress of the works. Nonetheless, it is good practice for such supplemental inspections to occur.

Before attending site, it is important that the inspecting engineer understands the scope of the site inspection and its purpose; any review can only be based on a sampling of the works that are available at the time. Where intrusive works are required to achieve the objective of the inspection, the inspecting engineer must provide a detailed specifi cation of what is to be done. Before attending site, they should confi rm that the necessary opening-up works have been completed.

This Technical Guidance Note concerns the inspection of structural elements that are typically present within buildings during their construction and/or alteration. It describes the elements, aspects of the elements which consistently prove to be problematic and, to some extent, how to detect defects. The note assumes that the inspecting engineer has suitable levels of competency.

It should also be borne in mind that, no matter who is employing the engineer, they have a duty of care to the public to ensure a building is safe.

Additional information

Format:
PDF
Pages:
5
Publisher:
The Institution of Structural Engineers

Tags

Technical Guidance Notes Technical Guidance Notes (Level 2) Technical Guidance Notes Technical Issue 9

Related Resources & Events

The Structural Engineer
Technical Guidance Note (Level 2, No. 9): Designing a reinforced concrete retaining wall

Technical Guidance Note (Level 2, No. 9): Designing a reinforced concrete retaining wall

Although retaining walls have been the subject of two earlier Technical Guidance Notes; No. 8 (Level 1): Derivation of loading to retaining structures and No. 33 (Level 1): Retaining wall construction, their design has not been covered. This guidance note focuses specifically on the design of reinforced concrete gravity retaining walls. There are three different forms of this type of wall, all of which are designed to resist overturning and sliding failure. The primary difference between them is their height. The taller the retaining wall, the more likely that counterforts and beams spanning between them will be necessary. This note describes how all of these forms of retaining wall can be designed. (This article was updated in October 2016 to reflect errata issued since its original publication.)

Date - 1 January 2014
Author - The Institution of Structural Engineers
Price - £0/£9
The Structural Engineer
Technical Guidance Note (Level 2, No. 19): Design and detailing of windposts to masonry walls

Technical Guidance Note (Level 2, No. 19): Design and detailing of windposts to masonry walls

Thin panels of masonry in large buildings, or cavity wall skins, require additional horizontal support to make them stable. The element that provides this support is a vertical prop known as a ‘windpost’. Its principal role is to provide lateral support against destabilising horizontal forces that typically originate from wind pressure – hence, the name. Windposts are typically steel elements – either open sections, such as channels or angles, or closed sections, such as rolled hollow rectangular sections. This Technical Guidance Note provides guidance on the design and detailing of windposts relating to their incorporation into building structures.

Date - 2 January 2019
Author - C. O'Regan (AECOM)
Price - £0/£9
The Structural Engineer
Technical Guidance Note (Level 2, No. 15): Design of timber posts

Technical Guidance Note (Level 2, No. 15): Design of timber posts

The design of timber posts follows the same principles as the design of vertical structural elements formed from other materials. Extreme fibre stresses or buckling due to applied axial forces are the key components affecting a post’s ability to perform. The major difference is the anisotropic nature of timber, which, for vertical elements, has a significant impact on the assessment of their performance as a structural member. The design of timber elements in the UK, according to current codes of practice, is based on limit state theory. This Technical Guidance Note adopts this approach to describe the design of timber posts. The note assumes that the reader is familiar with the use of coefficient factors prevalent within BS EN 1995-1-1 (Eurocode 5), as described in Technical Guidance Notes Level 1, No. 18 Design of timber floor joists and Level 2, No. 14 Design of unrestrained timber beams.

Date - 1 February 2018
Author - C. O'Regan (AECOM)
Price - £0/£9