Technical Guidance Note (Level 2, No. 22): Workmanship and quality inspections by the structural eng

Author: Chris O'Regan

Date published

2 September 2019

Price

Standard: £9

Members/Subscribers: Free

Buy Now
Back to Previous

Technical Guidance Note (Level 2, No. 22): Workmanship and quality inspections by the structural engineer during construction

The Structural Engineer
Technical Guidance Note (Level 2, No. 22): Workmanship and quality inspections by the structural eng
Date published

2 September 2019

Author

Chris O'Regan

Price

Standard: £9

Members/Subscribers: Free

Buy Now
Author

Chris O'Regan

Inspection of works on site during construction is a high-risk activity which requires skill and experience. Inspections are of the utmost importance as they help to reduce the risk of defects being present within the structure of the building – although they can never guarantee it. They should only be performed by those who are familiar with the design of the works and the limitations of construction methods.

The construction phase of a project is the stage where its design is implemented. Unforeseen variables have an impact on the assumptions made and changes may occur to the original design. Workmanship is also important, as the structural model used in design assumes good practice will be followed on site. For materials for which the partial factors used in design vary depending on the level of workmanship/supervision, it is essential to confirm that design assumptions have not been jeopardised.

It is typically the responsibility of the main contractor, supported by the specialist contractors’ designers, to ensure that the works are delivered in accordance with the design documentation.

The principal way workmanship is assured is through supervision and oversight by the main contractor. Any inspection carried out by the client’s design team, including by the structural engineer, will be in addition to the contractor’s monitoring of progress of the works. Nonetheless, it is good practice for such supplemental inspections to occur.

Before attending site, it is important that the inspecting engineer understands the scope of the site inspection and its purpose; any review can only be based on a sampling of the works that are available at the time. Where intrusive works are required to achieve the objective of the inspection, the inspecting engineer must provide a detailed specification of what is to be done. Before attending site, they should confirm that the necessary opening-up works have been completed.

This Technical Guidance Note concerns the inspection of structural elements that are typically present within buildings during their construction and/or alteration. It describes the elements, aspects of the elements which consistently prove to be problematic and, to some extent, how to detect defects. The note assumes that the inspecting engineer has suitable levels of competency.

It should also be borne in mind that, no matter who is employing the engineer, they have a duty of care to the public to ensure a building is safe.

Correction

This note contains an error in Figure 2. The figure describes the indentation pattern on the surface of the concrete as ‘plastic settlement’, when in fact it is the far more common and benign effect of ‘reinforcement ripple’.

Further information on reinforcement ripple can be found in Concrete Advice Sheet No. 6 Reinforcement ripple, and further information on plastic settlement can be found in Technical Report 22 Non-structural cracks in concrete. Both texts are published by the Concrete Society.

Additional information

Format:
PDF
Pages:
5
Publisher:
The Institution of Structural Engineers

Tags

Technical Guidance Notes Technical Guidance Notes (Level 2) Technical Guidance Notes Technical Issue 9

Related Resources & Events

The Structural Engineer
<h4>Technical Guidance Note (Level 2, No. 17): Simple connections in steel frames</h4>

Technical Guidance Note (Level 2, No. 17): Simple connections in steel frames

This Technical Guidance Note aims to clarify the term 'simple connection' by explaining its use when designing connections within steel frames. Additionally, guidance is offered on different types of simple connection and the design checks that need to be carried out.

Date - 3 September 2018
Author - C. O'Regan (AECOM)
Price - £0/£9
The Structural Engineer
<h4>Technical Guidance Note (Level 2, No. 18): Design of unreinforced masonry retaining walls</h4>

Technical Guidance Note (Level 2, No. 18): Design of unreinforced masonry retaining walls

This Technical Guidance Note is intended to act as an aide to those seeking to design an unreinforced masonry retaining wall. Following this guidance will prevent cracking and ensure that the wall performs as originally intended. The note will not cover the design of reinforced masonry retaining walls and variants of that form. Such reinforcement typically strengthens the wall itself against induced bending stresses and the wall’s geometry will therefore be somewhat different to that of an unreinforced retaining wall. The note will also not discuss the applied actions that a retaining wall will be subjected to, nor the construction of retaining walls. These subjects have previously been covered in the following Technical Guidance Notes: Level 1, No. 8: Derivation of loading to retaining structures and Level 1, No. 33: Retaining wall construction. It is assumed that the reader is familiar with the content of both these notes.

Date - 1 October 2018
Author - C. O'Regan (AECOM)
Price - £0/£9
The Structural Engineer
<h4>Technical Guidance Note (Level 2, No. 16): Design of reinforced concrete bored piles</h4>

Technical Guidance Note (Level 2, No. 16): Design of reinforced concrete bored piles

Piled foundations are one of the first aspects of scheme design a structural engineer needs to consider during a project's development. It is at this crucial stage that, without any specialist input, the structural engineer must make recommendations based on the typically limited knowledge they have on the subject. This Technical Guidance Note describes the method by which bored piles are designed using the current UK codes of practice, i.e. BS EN 1997 (Eurocode 7). It explains how to interpret soil conditions and design piles to match what has been discovered following a site investigation. The note does not address the types of piling systems that are available, nor the technical issues concerning their installation; these questions are covered in Technical Guidance Note Level 1, No. 23 Introduction to piling . The note explains how to design what is essentially a buried column of concrete to resist forces from the superstructure that are applied to it. It concerns the design of a single pile and not one that is part of a group. For information on how grouped piles differ in their design approach, the reader is directed to Cl. 6.3.3 of BS 8004:2015. (This article was update on 9 March 2018 to correct an error in Table 6.)

Date - 1 March 2018
Author - C. O'Regan (AECOM)
Price - £0/£9